Maximus and Odysseus Essays -- essays research papers

Maximus and OdysseusWhile watching the film Gladiator with my daughter I realized the striking similarities that heroes shargon. However, I always wonder who is to a greater extent than of a hero. The definition or hero is a person historied for feats of courage or nobility of purpose, especi each(prenominal)y one who has risked or sacrificed his or her life. So let us compare the two heroes as the lexicon sterilizes them. In the end I hope to be able to define who is a greater hero.Maximus was a great warrior in the Roman drove under Emperor Marcus Aurelius. His rootage-class honours degree courageous feat occurs when he defeats the function of the Barbarians of Germaina. Leading his army along a 12 year unravel he brought it to an end. Next he risks his life as he defies the cutting Emperor Commodus, knowing that this could mean death. Commodus was the still son of Marcus Aurelius. However Commodus killed his sire and took the place of Caesar. During his second courage ous act, his married woman and only son are murdered and he is to be executed. This changing his journey home as I will discuss as we move on. Furthering his acts of heroism he manages to save the lives of many slaves by battling in the sphere of influence, saving a senator from execution, and avenging his wife and son by slaying the emperor. His acts of nobility occur when he saves the senator and fulfils the wishes of the stillborn Marcus Aurelius. He pulls Rome covering to the senate and returns the power back to the people.Maximus continuing acts of altruistic heroism and putting his life at stake for those who betrayed him make him great. His first act of selflessness occurred when he agreed to help out Commodus sister, who knowingly let his nestling, wife, and almost himself be slain. He forgives her and agrees to meet with her senator to help give Rome back. His second act of selflessness occurred when he battled in the arena taking on 5 enemies while the other slaves s tayed in the back of the entryway. Going to his journey home, he no longer needed to orbital cavity the olive fields with stones that warm in the sun as his child plays, and his wife helps with the harvest. His journey has changed to yield his vengeance and in the end ruin so he can reunite with his family. I bring this up because dieing is a change as is the change Odysseus goes through by fundamentally becoming no one, a regular Joe so to say. This is what I accept... ...live because he believed he wasnt truly out to get his wife, but more so to the fact that he could sing the tale of the events later when it was all done. Revenge is much simpler than other factors. I believe at first Odysseus was out for glory at first, I find that is the real causa he was in the war. Maximus stated from day one that he only wished to return home so he could be with his family. I think the inner qualities of Maximus make him more of a hero. However, not taking anything outdoor(a) from Ody sseus, I believe that many people in his case would find taken the chance to kill all the men that tried to get with their wives if they were away. I believe it took lots of courage to wrestle with Poseidon, leave islands with fine-looking women, and his use of intelligence to beat the Cyclops was great. In the end I believe the only real thing that makes Maximus a better character reference and hero is that he killed for reasons better than Odysseus. Mainly in the end, when Odysseus kills the suitors, I believe I would have probably done the same thing, but that doesnt make it right. Maximus saved a nation and did what was right. These are the reasons that Maximus has the edge on Odysseus.